Online gambling apps are sophisticated products built to keep users playing. Behind sleek user interfaces are engagement-driven design tactics that keep users betting longer. The scale of harm is growing, with increasing evidence of financial loss, psychological harm, and addiction, particularly among young adults and college students.
For attorneys, the combination of deep-pocket defendants, documented engagement tactics, and a rapidly expanding class of potential claimants makes this both a public health crisis and a litigation opportunity.
Key Takeaways
- Allegations: Gambling apps exploit users through addictive design (variable rewards, near-miss mechanics, and personalized engagement) and deceptive marketing. Features such as free-play incentives, live/in-game betting, and VIP or concierge promotions are alleged to encourage compulsive use—especially among younger users.
- Legal posture: Plaintiffs are pursuing a product liability theory, arguing that these apps are defectively designed to foster addiction while lacking adequate warnings.
- Where it’s going: Federal suits are advancing after the 2018 Supreme Court ruling (Murphy v. NCAA), which allowed states to legalize sports betting. Coordination among claims is expected as litigation targets major operators including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and Caesars.
- Regulatory action: Several states have fined operators for violating self-exclusion safeguards and for use of misleading “risk-free” promotions. Attorneys general may also pursue consumer protection and injunctive relief claims, especially around youth-targeted advertising.
- Who may qualify: Adults 18–30 who developed a gambling disorder or suffered significant losses while using apps like FanDuel, DraftKings, BetMGM, or Caesars. Cases are stronger when supported by evidence of debt, mental health harm (depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation), or attempted/completed suicide associated with app use.
The Addictive Design of Gambling Apps
These apps mirror the mechanics of casino slot machines, but with constant accessibility via smartphones. They employ:
- Variable rewards and near-miss effects to maintain engagement.
- Free-play incentives that minimize perceived risk.
- In-game and live betting that blur the line between entertainment and gambling.
- Personalized promotions built from user data to drive higher betting frequency.
The result is an environment where users may not realize how much they’re wagering or how quickly small bets can spiral into substantial losses.
Who Is Most at Risk?
Adolescents and young adults are disproportionately affected. Their prefrontal cortex, which regulates impulse control, develops more slowly than the brain’s dopamine-based reward system, leading to higher risk-taking tendencies.
Key statistics from the NCAA and related studies:
- 75% of college students gamble; 67% bet on sports.
- 1 in 20 meet the criteria for compulsive gambling.
- 60% of 18–22-year-olds have placed a bet.
- 6% report losing more than $500 in a single day.
This growing engagement has been linked to increased depression, anxiety, substance abuse, and suicidal ideation, reflecting a serious and preventable public health issue.
The Legal Landscape
For decades, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) restricted sports betting to a few jurisdictions such as Nevada. That changed in 2018 with Murphy v. NCAA, when the Supreme Court ruled that PAPSA violated the 10th Amendment’s anti-commandeering doctrine, opening the door for states to legalize sports betting.
Since then, mobile sports betting has expanded rapidly, with DraftKings and FanDuel controlling roughly 75% of the U.S. market.
Plaintiffs argue that these apps are defectively designed products that promote compulsive use while failing to include adequate warnings or safeguards. Unlike social media litigation, Section 230 immunity is less relevant here, because the operators control both the content and mechanics of their apps.
State regulators have issued fines for violations of self-exclusion lists and deceptive marketing, while the American Gaming Association has updated its 2023 code to discourage college partnerships and prohibit the use of “risk-free” language.
Attorneys general are also expected to pursue consumer protection actions, which can move faster than private litigation.
Litigation Criteria and Case Potential
This emerging litigation contains the core elements of a strong mass tort:
- Vulnerable victims: Primarily young adults and college students.
- Deep-pocket defendants:
- DraftKings: $21.7B market cap
- BetMGM: $9.42B market cap
- Caesars: $5.31B market cap
- Clear misconduct: Addictive app design, misleading promotions, and insufficient user safeguards.
- Strong evidence: Internal engagement metrics, academic research, and clinical diagnoses of gambling disorder (DSM-5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are online gambling apps facing lawsuits?
These lawsuits argue that apps like DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and Caesars are defectively designed products. They use addictive features, such as live betting, variable rewards, and “risk-free” promotions, to encourage compulsive gambling. Plaintiffs also allege inadequate warnings and deceptive marketing, especially targeting young people
Who may qualify to bring a claim?
Potential claimants include adults 18–30 who developed a gambling disorder, suffered substantial financial losses, or experienced mental health harm (depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation) linked to gambling app use. High-value cases often involve six-figure losses or documented suicidal behavior tied to compulsive betting.
How do gambling apps impact college students?
Research shows a growing campus gambling crisis. Roughly 75% of college students gamble, and 1 in 20 meet the criteria for compulsive gambling disorder. App design and marketing—especially partnerships with colleges and sports events—make students particularly susceptible. The outcomes often include financial distress, academic decline, and mental health deterioration.
Explore Mass Tort Co-Counsel Opportunities
By working with Broughton Partners, your firm gains direct access to qualified retainers, without the administrative burden. Our team runs targeted campaigns across TV, radio, social media, and digital platforms. Every claimant is screened through a 24/7 in-house call center using law firm-approved eligibility criteria, and only pre-qualified retainers are delivered to your team.
Let us help you grow your caseload ethically and efficiently while protecting your license and reputation every step of the way. Contact us today to get started.
